Saturday, March 31, 2012

Barth against presuppositions

In the chapter on The Spirit in Evangelical Theology: An Introduction it is interesting how much Barth cautions about relying on presuppositions in theology. In particular, such a reliance can rob Theology of real power, that of the Holy Spirit. 
If theology wished to provide a presupposition for its statements, it would mean that it sought to make them, itself, and its work safe from any attack, risk, or jeopardy. It would presume that it could and must secure them (even if this presupposition was a tour de force, a Deus ex machina introduced in the form of a further theological statement). Precisely in this way theology would sell its birthright for a mess of pottage. Theology can only do its work. It cannot, however, seek to secure its operation. Its work can be well done only when all presuppositions are renounced which would secure it from without or within. 
What can be arbitrarily presupposed, obviously stands at one's disposal. Were theology to presuppose the power sustaining its statements and itself (in the manner that mathematics presupposes the axioms supporting its theorems), then theology would assume power in its own right, superior to that first and fundamental power. Theology could then muster that power for its self-protection or at least place it on guard duty.  
The true power, which is powerful in its own right, defies being a potency which theology can possess and manipulate in its statements. Such presumed potency would be something like Münchausen trying to pull himself out of the bog by his own hair. In one way or another the very thing theology seeks (because in fact it needs it) would be lost whenever theology attempted to rely upon such an arbitrary presupposition. 
We have to speak, therefore, of the real power that is hidden in theological assertions-hidden, unattainable, unavailable not only to the environment but also to the very theology which serves the community. This is the power present and active in what the affirmations of theology declare, in the history of salvation and revelation, in the hearing and speech of the biblical witnesses, in the being and act of the community summoned by them, and also in the work of theology when it testifies to these things. But this power is also totally superior to theology itself.
Evangelical Theology, page 50-51.
The Holy Spirit is the vital power that bestows free mercy on theology and on theologians just as on the community and on every single Christian.... 
In its total poverty evangelical theology is rich, sustained, and upheld by its total lack of presuppositions.
page 59

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Science and religion in the secular university

Is there a role for academic studies of the relations between science and religion in secular universities? First, this is a fascinating intellectual issue with a long history.
Second, public misunderstanding about the relationship between science and religion presents major problems for society. Mutual hostility between entrenched parties on both sides is:
  • endangering civil public debate 
  • endangering the quality of science education
  • eroding public support for science 
  • undermining the contribution and credibility of the church in public ethical and political debate. 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

5 types of argument for the existence of God

This week in the Apologetics course we are looking at the 5 main types of philosophical argument that have been historically used to argue for the existence of God. The course notes nicely summarise them with the figure below.
So what is the role of these arguments in apologetics?
To me, they show the limited role of reason. Even if one accepts one or more of these arguments they tell us nothing about the character of this God or Supreme Being, or the action of this God in history, or how we can or should relate to this God.
To me, none of these arguments presents a particularly compelling “stand alone” argument. I find the Moral and Teleological arguments the most convincing, perhaps because they are not just purely philosophical but engage with external evidence. On the other hand, putting all the arguments together with a Biblical world view, they may suggest that faith in God is not unreasonable.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

The Spirit of a modest happy free critical science!

This coming saturday in the theology discussion group we are reading and discussing chapters 4 and 5 of Karl Barth's Evangelical Theology: An Introduction. The chapter titles are The Community and The Spirit. The latter includes: 

It was the Spirit whose existence and action make possible and real (and possible and real up to this very day) the existence of Christianity in the world. Up to this very day the Spirit calls into being the existence of every single Christian as a believing, loving, hoping witness to the Word of God. The Spirit does this certainly and irresistibly (for to wish to withstand him, when he steps in and acts, would be the one unforgivable sin), for he alone does this. "Any one who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him" ( Rom. 8:9).
It is clear that evangelical theology itself can only be pneumatic, spiritual theology. Only in the realm of the power of the Spirit can theology be realized as a humble, free, critical, and happy science of the God of the Gospel. Only in the courageous confidence that the Spirit is the truth does theology simultaneously pose and answer the question about truth.
page 55 

Covenantal creation II

I am reading through Genesis and have been struck by the theme of covenant. This first occurs in Genesis 6 where God promises a covenant with Noah. It is striking that the word covenant occurs 7 times in chapter 9. This is followed by God's covenant with Abraham (Genesis 12-17, particularly 17).

I can see why Karl Barth read the covenant theme back into Genesis 1-2. His detailed exegesis of these 2 chapters in Church Dogmatics 3.1 were respectively entitled:

Creation is the external basis of the covenant

Covenant is the internal basis of creation

John Webster has an elegant summary of these two points.

Friday, March 23, 2012

O.K.

Those are the powerful last words of the movie, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
I think it is a truly weird movie.
However, the final dialogue (below) redeems the movie.



This is quite the contrast to the average idolatrous Hollywood romance where the message is you have to find that special someone who will make you complete and fulfil you.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Is the Gospel true?

This week in the apologetics course we are looking at "Concepts of truth". There are four different ways one could ask and answer the question, "Is the Gospel true"?

1. Does the Gospel fit the facts?
The correspondence theory of truth

2. Does the Gospel make sense? Is it consistent within itself and with other observations?
The coherence theory of truth

3. Does believing the Gospel work? i.e., make a concrete difference in peoples lives.
The pragmatic theory of truth

4. Is the Gospel true for me? Is it personally relevant?
The personal theory of truth

I found it helpful to contrast the ancient Greek view of truth: something intellectual, independent of personal and moral connotations, with a Biblical view.
In the Old Testament truth is usually discussed in the context of the character of God or a person and is related to faithfulness, dependability, consistency, and reliability.
In the New Testament it is also related to completeness and integrity and personal involvement.

Overall, a Biblical view of truth is multi-faceted and should engage with all four questions above.