At the
Immanent Frame a group of writers discussed
The new landscape of the religion blogosphere. I thought the following comments from Joe Carter, Web editor at
First Things, are quite insightful and amusing.
Despite their importance, there is no council, diocese, presbytery, or synod that oversees and sanctions these religious blogs. But should these bloggers be able to teach large audiences without oversight from a higher-level polity? If a professor and ordained minister at a Presbyterian college writes regularly on issues about religion and theology, should her writing be exempt from denominational authority? Or what if a Lutheran layman and a Catholic priest hold a regular open debate? Should they not be held to account as if they were writing in a denominational magazine or journal?
I suspect that most religion bloggers will argue that their blogging should not be overseen or scrutinized by their college, local church, or other ecclesiastical body. They would claim that since their blogs are neither churches nor parachurch ministries, they should be free from congregational supervision—even when they are writing about issues concerning their denomination’s view of doctrine. If this view is widely held—and my own experience convinces me it is—it marks a peculiar shift in the decentralization of ecclesiastical authority. Whether they are Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant, when it comes to religious discussions online, all bloggers act like Baptists.
Agreed! :) I would find it odd and unnecessary to have an organised church group oversee it.
ReplyDeleteNailing my thesis to the wall, I say isn't it wonderful we can add the adjective ( been reading a bit of Shakespeare recently) add good as an adjective and even "good Lutheran "sounds right on.The priesthood of all believers .
ReplyDelete